(no subject)
Jan. 8th, 2007 12:37 pmSo, on this House/Cam community they have links to this poll HELLO! magazine is doing , and Hugh Laurie is up for Most Attractive Man and Jennifer Morrison is up for Most Attractive Woman (and both are doing quite well, actually, though how Jennifer Morrison can beat Salma Hayek is just... beyond me), but than I clicked on Most Elegant Woman.
There are a lot of royals up there, and some ladies you'd expect- Cate Blanchett, Kate Winslet, Catherine Zeta-Jones. And then the random, like Keira Knightley and Natalie Imbruglia.
And then there's the downright upsetting.
In the number two spot is... BRITNEY SPEARS.
[Poll #902828]
There are a lot of royals up there, and some ladies you'd expect- Cate Blanchett, Kate Winslet, Catherine Zeta-Jones. And then the random, like Keira Knightley and Natalie Imbruglia.
And then there's the downright upsetting.
In the number two spot is... BRITNEY SPEARS.
[Poll #902828]
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 06:32 pm (UTC)Those are all pretty awful pictures of the actresses in question.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 07:45 pm (UTC)And I agree about the pictures.
(AND I LOVE YOUR ICON OMG.)
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 08:25 pm (UTC)Many more gorgeous Notorious icons here.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 09:15 pm (UTC)They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means. :p
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-08 10:18 pm (UTC)I think you automatically get elegant points by dumping "that douchebag that the entire world hates but you, for some cracked-out reason, married and had two children with."
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 05:35 am (UTC)